POSTING GUIDELINES
This forum is intended to provide an atmosphere of open communication, where each member can share his or her own insights and opinions. To help achieve this goal, we ask that you:
Do not post libelous or illegal material.
Do not post harassing or discriminatory comments based on race, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual orientation.
Do not solicit or advertise.
If you have questions or comments about this forum (such as technical difficulties or performance issues), please contact your forum administrator for the appropriate channel for your inquiry.
Moderation
Any post that violates the above conditions, or departs from the intended purpose of this forum may be removed without notice by the administration.
We reserve the right to edit any post for reasons including, but not limited to: language, length, or content not appropriate to the topic of this forum.
Older threads or messages may be removed from time to time, to main to maintain categories or threads of manageable length.
Any member who breaches these Guidelines through hostile, abusive or other inappropriate behavior may find their account privileges revoked.
Privacy
Remember that this is a public forum, and you have no guarantee or expectation of privacy. Your post could be read by anyone.
Posts can be traced. We record information about every user of this forum, and will honor any court orders or requests by recognized law authorities for information about individuals posting libelous material.
All communications on this board are deemed to by public and not private communications. We reserve the right to remove without notice any message posted for any reason, but we have no obligation to remove content you find objectionable.
Regarding your email address and other personal information
Although we require your email address for verification purposes, we recommend that you do not post it or any other personal information such, as phone numbers or your home address. Your posts can be searched by bots or third parties that have no affiliation with the administrator of this forum.
Disclaimer
The views expressed by members of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the administrator or other members. Each member is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.
Please report any activity that you notice which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the management immediately.
I'd just like to voice my utter frustration at the decision made my Sir Bob and the Live 8 organisers as reported in todays newspapers.
It seems as though musical snobbery and subjective perceptions of 'seriousness' and 'credibilty' has already begun to taint an event that is supposed to be about bringing musicians together, from all genres, to support one common cause, by those very people organising the said event.
The Spice Girls are undeniably one of the most influential, and successful pop acts of the last decade. Their first two albums along have sold in excess of 40 million copies, as a group they have achieved 8 UK number one singles, and as solo acts have amassed a staggering 34 top 20 hit between them, all while being the last British act to majorly crack the US charts.
If this along does not make the Spice Girls 'worthy' enough to perform at Live 8, then I would like to ask Sir Bob ad the Live 8 organisers, by what criteria are they assessing the suitability of the peformers at the event?
Who decides what is 'credible' music? The Radio One playlist? The NME? Sir Bob himself? Have the Live 8 organisers abused their power and influence over the charity event in order to steer the concerts choice in acts in a direction they want it to go?
The spokesperson for the BBC, quoted today in the Daily Mirror, seemed to feel that the Spice Girls are too 'trivial' and not 'serious' enough for the event...
Yet an ex Take That member butchering Queen classics, the ever so political Destiny's Child (like the Spice Girls, but black) and Joss Stone (a posh girl from Devon who likes to think she's an American soul diva and recently admitted to not knowing who Sir Bob was and on meeting called him 'Sir Gandalf') areserious enough to perform!?
It seems to me that the only thing 'trivial' about the concerts choice in performers is the organisers blatant, pretentious musical snobbery in regards to an event that should cast subjective boundaries of individual musical taste aside in the name of a good cause.
What's more, news of the Spice Girls possible reunion for Live 8 has been filling newspaper pages for the last week. Their performance would have doubled the concerts profile, all contributing to raising awareness for the Live 8/Make Poverty History cause. However, rather than welcoming that oppurtunity, the Live 8 organisers have thrown it back in the face of the Spice Girls, and fans of popular music worldwide, all in the name of musical snobbery.
Not wanting to cast even more of shadow over the event, but I predict that future newspapers column inches may not be so positive about the the Live 8 concert...
quote: Originally posted by: RhythmNative ...The Spice Girls are undeniably one of the most influential, and successful pop acts of the last decade. Their first two albums along have sold in excess of 40 million copies, as a group they have achieved 8 UK number one singles, and as solo acts have amassed a staggering 34 top 20 hit between them, all while being the last British act to majorly crack the US charts. If this along does not make the Spice Girls 'worthy' enough to perform at Live 8, then I would like to ask Sir Bob and the Live 8 organisers, by what criteria are they assessing the suitability of the peformers at the event? Who decides what is 'credible' music? The Radio One playlist? The NME? Sir Bob himself? "
Other stars will be announced over the coming weeks - with the Spice Girls still rumoured to be staging a reunion.
"I spoke to them this morning and it's looking very good," Geldof said. "There's a lot of stuff they have got to sort through. They are trying to resolve differences of many years."
Personally, I suspect the reason they would not be in 'Live' 8 is that they aren't renowned for their 'live' performances. You do make some valid points, but I think the criteria for selection is how good they are live, not their record sales. It would be good if the NME did select the acts, but it looks more like Q magazine
Hello all! What do you think of having African musicians play at these shows? Who would you like to see? Who are some of your favorites? Do any of you play instruments?
One of my pet peeve is when someone rants about something without citing the source, making it impossible to judge the validity of it. My general understanding was that Bob was fond of the Spice Girls (wasn't he in their movie?), so I don't see why he would be snubbing them all of a sudden.
Hello all! What do you think of having African musicians play at these shows? Who would you like to see? Who are some of your favorites? Do any of you play instruments?
I think this would be a fantastic idea. Sadly I don't know enough African musicians to make suggestions other than Johnny Clegg. I saw him again last summer and he was great.
Your quote: "Have the Live 8 organisers abused their power and influence over the charity event in order to steer the concerts choice in acts in a direction they want it to go?"
This is a very idiotic question, to be honest. If they are the organisers of the event - meaning that Bob Geldof probably granted that position, and thoroughly monitors is - then they have every right to steer the acts in a way that they believe would be pleasing to the audience.
They also have the right to choose any performers that they know on a personal level. The Spice Girls were popular in the mid and late 1990's. Singers such as Joss Stone are relatively new. How popular was Madonna at Live Aid? Not very. He picked rising stars to bring in more viewers, just as he is doing now. Personally, I enjoy rock 'n' roll more than pop. I was a large fan of the Spice Girls however.
But do you really think that almost a decade after their break that they should be playing at such an event? In my mind it makes no sense. I don't necessarily appreciate the music of 50 Cent, P. Diddy, Jay-Z, or several of the other "artists" that will perform. Unfortunately it's what's popular at the moment. The idea for this event is for people to watch. Big names get more viewers. The Spice Girls are no longer a big name. Perhaps you could make that argument for REM, A-ha, and Duran Duran. The difference is that these bands have been together (or were together) for many years and had many hits in their prime as well. But the main reason is that their music was actually good, not necessarily about just making money by flashing some skin and talking about "love," but by having good songs with powerful lyrics, instruments, talent, etc. They had more than boobs and a few albums. They had power.
While your opinion may not agree with that of the organisers, complaining in a simple forum won't do anything to really change the lineup of the show. My argument against your complaint probably won't do anything either. But I have nothing else to do right now than try to set a confused mind straight.
Stay groovy.
PS: Try to at least stop listening to the Spice Girls. Their music was lame and their movie sucked.
I think this would be a fantastic idea. Sadly I don't know enough African musicians to make suggestions other than Johnny Clegg. I saw him again last summer and he was great.
Try my Ya Congo website for an introducton to Congolese music. Different parts of Africa have their own music, so you could try the Sterns music shop website (also accessible via my website) as well if you want to sample some other African music. The Sterns samples are one minute long, which gives a good flavour of the introduction; many songs are eight or more minutes long and the tempo often increases as the songs develop, so the songs can get quite wild by the end.
They look interesting. I looked them up on the Google search engine. Have you seen them on concert? Do you have CDs? Would you recommend them for one of the Live8 shows?
Amazon website had sampling of this group and they seemed a bit quiet compared to African Congolese music which is more daneceable. Do you expect to dance at Live8 or do you prefer to listen & watch? A lot of African shows, you can't help but dance.