POSTING GUIDELINES
This forum is intended to provide an atmosphere of open communication, where each member can share his or her own insights and opinions. To help achieve this goal, we ask that you:
Do not post libelous or illegal material.
Do not post harassing or discriminatory comments based on race, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual orientation.
Do not solicit or advertise.
If you have questions or comments about this forum (such as technical difficulties or performance issues), please contact your forum administrator for the appropriate channel for your inquiry.
Moderation
Any post that violates the above conditions, or departs from the intended purpose of this forum may be removed without notice by the administration.
We reserve the right to edit any post for reasons including, but not limited to: language, length, or content not appropriate to the topic of this forum.
Older threads or messages may be removed from time to time, to main to maintain categories or threads of manageable length.
Any member who breaches these Guidelines through hostile, abusive or other inappropriate behavior may find their account privileges revoked.
Privacy
Remember that this is a public forum, and you have no guarantee or expectation of privacy. Your post could be read by anyone.
Posts can be traced. We record information about every user of this forum, and will honor any court orders or requests by recognized law authorities for information about individuals posting libelous material.
All communications on this board are deemed to by public and not private communications. We reserve the right to remove without notice any message posted for any reason, but we have no obligation to remove content you find objectionable.
Regarding your email address and other personal information
Although we require your email address for verification purposes, we recommend that you do not post it or any other personal information such, as phone numbers or your home address. Your posts can be searched by bots or third parties that have no affiliation with the administrator of this forum.
Disclaimer
The views expressed by members of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the administrator or other members. Each member is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.
Please report any activity that you notice which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the management immediately.
Let's hope he can sort something out. This is disgraceful.
Gleneagles money for Africa goes to Iraq
September 11 2005 at 04:11PM
By Caroline Hooper-Box
Barely two months since the G8 summit at Gleneagles in Scotland, it has emerged that part of the much-heralded foreign aid money promised for Africa is in fact earmarked for debt relief in Iraqi.
This is according to Stephen Lewis, UN special envoy for HIV/Aids in Africa, who told Sunday Argus: "Gleneagles may well turn out to be one of the greatest public relations exercises in G8 history."
The G8 (Group of 8) countries are the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Canada and Russia.
At the July summit they committed to replenish the Global Fund to fight Aids, TB and malaria and to ensure "universal access" to HIV treatment by 2010.
The Global Fund replenishment conference hosted by the British government in London this week, and chaired by UN secretary general Kofi Annan, was the first test of the promises made at Gleneagles, Lewis said, speaking from Toronto this week, but it was "an abject failure".
Governments at the conference came up with $3,7-billion (about R23,3-billion) for the fund, just over half of what was needed.
"At the the first test to show their honourable intent, they default." The Global Fund is $3,4-billion short of replenishment, he said, and was a failure to honour the Gleneagles promise of full funding of the Global Fund. "This shortfall is calamitous."
The lack of commitment shown by world leaders to the Global Fund on HIV/Aids will mean the Millennium Development Goals "cannot possibly be met in Africa," said Lewis.
The UN meets this week to discuss how close countries are to achieving Millennium Development Goals, which are meant to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger, achieve universal primary education, reduce child mortality, ensure environmental sustainability, and to combat HIV/Aids, malaria and other diseases.
International anti-poverty agency ActionAid said the shortfall sent a "worrying signal" to the hardest-hit sub-Saharan countries. Global Aids activist coalition Make Aids History, said that in terms of the death toll, Aids, TB and malaria equal the effect of last year's Asian tsunami every two weeks.
South Africa has pledged R36-million to the Global Fund over the next three years, health minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang announced at the conference on Tuesday.
The most significant outcome of the Gleneagles Summit was widely acknowledged as the promise of doubling of aid to Africa - an extra $25-billion by 2010. Japan has now admitted that part of the money it had pledged at Gleneagles would almost certainly be used to reduce debt in Iraq, Lewis said, a development which he said "took my breath away".
The money promised at Gleneagles to Africa was not expected to "suddenly be siphoned off to pay debts, and certainly not Iraqi debt". The new Iraq regime has a $200-billion debt burden.
Making matters worse, Germany and Italy have announced they might not meet the commitments they made at Gleneagles due to "budgetary constraints", and British finance minister Gordon Brown, 11 days after the summit, admitted that the extra money for aid promised by the G8 leaders included the extra money promised for debt relief.
The UN this week said under-funded African countries were facing disaster, and that their appeals for funds to ward off famine were being ignored.
UN humanitarian chief Jan Egeland that it had launched an appeal for $88-million to help Malawi deal with a food crisis threatening a third of its population. However 10 days later not a single cent has been donated. He warned that 10 million lives were at stake in Lesotho, Mozambique, Swaziland, Zambia, Malawi and Zimbabwe.
? This article was originally published on page 8 of Cape Argus on September 11, 2005
i bet bush sees this an oppotunity to complain about how his country (no offense to all the americans on here, its just bush) is so much worse of than everywhere else
it is utterly disgraceful.i think theyr just doing it cos they feel obliged to help the iraqis after the war and stuff.but other than public spur theres no hard force driving them to help africa.they shud all be ashamed.just cos its not theyr immediate power causing suffering they dont care.
I think they are doing it because Iraq is important to them in terms of oil and politically, they are not interested in Africa it means nothing politically or financially.