POSTING GUIDELINES
This forum is intended to provide an atmosphere of open communication, where each member can share his or her own insights and opinions. To help achieve this goal, we ask that you:
Do not post libelous or illegal material.
Do not post harassing or discriminatory comments based on race, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual orientation.
Do not solicit or advertise.
If you have questions or comments about this forum (such as technical difficulties or performance issues), please contact your forum administrator for the appropriate channel for your inquiry.
Moderation
Any post that violates the above conditions, or departs from the intended purpose of this forum may be removed without notice by the administration.
We reserve the right to edit any post for reasons including, but not limited to: language, length, or content not appropriate to the topic of this forum.
Older threads or messages may be removed from time to time, to main to maintain categories or threads of manageable length.
Any member who breaches these Guidelines through hostile, abusive or other inappropriate behavior may find their account privileges revoked.
Privacy
Remember that this is a public forum, and you have no guarantee or expectation of privacy. Your post could be read by anyone.
Posts can be traced. We record information about every user of this forum, and will honor any court orders or requests by recognized law authorities for information about individuals posting libelous material.
All communications on this board are deemed to by public and not private communications. We reserve the right to remove without notice any message posted for any reason, but we have no obligation to remove content you find objectionable.
Regarding your email address and other personal information
Although we require your email address for verification purposes, we recommend that you do not post it or any other personal information such, as phone numbers or your home address. Your posts can be searched by bots or third parties that have no affiliation with the administrator of this forum.
Disclaimer
The views expressed by members of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the administrator or other members. Each member is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.
Please report any activity that you notice which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the management immediately.
Survey: Geldof is celebrity most admired by teenagers
Bob Geldof has been named as the celebrity that most teenagers admire, according to a poll for the Duke of Edinburgh's Award.
The Irish rock star turned campaigner was picked by 19% of those questioned in a survey on role models to mark the 50th anniversary of the scheme.
Olympic gold winning athlete Dame Kelly Holmes came second with 18%, while Sir Richard Branson was third with 16%.
The Irish rock star turned campaigner was picked by 19% of those questioned in a survey on role models to mark the 50th anniversary of the scheme.
Olympic gold winning athlete Dame Kelly Holmes came second with 18%, while Sir Richard Branson was third with 16%. <A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://ad.ie.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh=v6|3425|3|0|%2a|o%3B34948536%3B0-0%3B0%3B13335199%3B4307-300|250%3B17304523|17322418|1%3B%3B%7Esscs%3D%3fhttp://www.sky.com/skycom/article/0,,91069-1130664,00.html"><IMG SRC="http://ad.ie.doubleclick.net/1048073/SK3238_300x250.gif" BORDER=0></A>
Fourth was former England soccer captain David Beckham who was admired by nearly 12% of teens.
Celebrity Big Brother winner Chantelle Houghton notched up only 5%, while drug addicted rock star Pete Doherty came bottom of the list the teenagers were shown with just under 2%.
Research by the award scheme found that British teenagers give up around two million voluntary hours each year serving their community, the equivalent of £9 million in unpaid labour hours.
Young Britons admire expertise (23%), but most (75%) were impressed by those who had "done something for the good of someone else".
Nine out of ten of those questioned said it was important to volunteer time to help improve the local community.
Peter Westgarth, chief executive of the Duke of Edinburgh`s Award, said: "It`s time young people of the UK were recognised for the work they do in the community.
"This research shows it`s not all about chasing fame, our younger generation really do care about their country.
"It`s refreshing to see so many young British teenagers looking up to positive role models who have really worked hard on behalf of others and gained recognition for services to the country."
Since the Duke of Edinburgh set up the scheme in 1956, more than 3.5 million young people have participated in the UK.
Aimed at both able-bodied and disabled youngsters, it has become one of the best-known self-development adventure schemes for 14 to 25-year-olds.
:: A total of 4,299 young people were questioned in the poll.
That is doubtful, apart from the very discerning teenager and those of you who participate in this forum, of course. They may not even know he's a singer. I remember over hearing a conversation between a young couple (early 20s at the most) on the way back from Live8. Their conversation was rather loud and couldn't be avoided - although they were in the seats in front of us. The male party did not that Bob Geldof had ever sung. The female laughed, but said she knew he was singer but didn't know what he'd ever actually sung.
ArrGee wrote: Fcuk me - this generation need some education and some gooddrugs.
And a good shot of anti-conservatism. I may be saying something you all know, but ArrGee's use of 'fcuk' reminded me of the perfume/after-shave marketed under that name. The company involved defended the name, as it was short for 'French Connection United Kingdom'. There's no doubt it's clever marketing, but after it was released in the US there were so many complaints (and knowing the US, a law suit or three), that it was banned from sale under the 'fcuk' name.
Instead, every package had to have the name 'French Connection United Kingdom' as the brand name, with not a 'fcuk' to be seen anywhere.
I've seen it here, and yes, it does immediately read as f*ck; but that's the point isn't it? Eye-catching - certainly. But it's only a fragrance, not a WMD.
Before I cop it, my comment isn't meant to offend the teenagers on this forum. It's a much more general statement about what seems to be a huge lack (or suppresion?) of alternative views to the incredible conservatism of the teenager's world.
Wonder if the US could tolerate another Woodstock ...
Would anyone go?????
PS ArrGee - I've just noticed your new signature - love it!!! BTW, what is he singing at the end of 'Banana Republic'?
In the US, if there was another "Woodstock" in the 1960s spirit-type of event, young people wouldn't probably go - as they are used to the corporate-sponsored type of concerts.
I believe people my age (Generation X) and people from the next older generation (Baby Boomers - original Woodstock generation) would go. The fundamentalists would be up in arms and all our names would go on a list of subversives.
I think it would be fun...we need more peace, love and understanding.
peace & take care,
debm
__________________
"And Lenin said 'There is no Heaven, so I don't believe in Room 19'" - Bob Geldof
and
"you can find adventure/in someone else's life/or you can criticize/when you need a lift" - Ric Ocasek
dam9191: I'm Gen X as well, and I think you're right on all the points you've made.
It's just a tad scary though that 5 of the leaders of the G8 are 'Baby Boomers', if that era is defined as 1946 - 1960 where people are now aged 46 - 60.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper 30 April 1959 - now 47
German Chancellor Angela Merkel 17 July 1954 - now 52
UK Prime Minister Tony Blair May 6 1953 - now 53
Russian President Vladimir Putin 7 October 1952 - now 53
US President Dubya 6 July 1946 - now 60
The three pre-boomers are:
Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi 8 January 1942 - now 64
Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi 9 August 1939 - now 66
French Prime Minister Jaques Chirac 29 November 1932 - now 73
Wonder what they were all doing when 'Woodstock' was on!
Just as well we've got 'Baby Boomer' (Sir) Bob Geldof to chill us out (5 October 1951 - now 54) ... When his 'management' aren't screwing things up
well next time he tours i'm gonna gather a whole group of friends to go...maybe then people will actually stand up and dance...i mean is it any wonder he's fed up when he turns up at a gig to be greeted by a bunch of people sitting still and smiling politely
The problem is Tango the venues don't like it when people get up and dance these days sadly. Bob usually gets us up at the end and we don't get pushed back to our seats then. In the old days there was never a problem.
Jules wrote:In the old days there was never a problem.
In the olden days you weren't supposed to stand on the seats, though no-one seemed to care too much in 1980 at 'The Police' concert when we balanced on the top of the back of the seats!
yeah but hull was just a hall...whats the problem with moving around in a hall...we couldnt have stood on the seats cos they would have collapsed so that wasnt an issue...everyones just so safety/insurance obsessed these days in case someone sues them or whatever that they 4get about the fun.it sux