POSTING GUIDELINES
This forum is intended to provide an atmosphere of open communication, where each member can share his or her own insights and opinions. To help achieve this goal, we ask that you:
Do not post libelous or illegal material.
Do not post harassing or discriminatory comments based on race, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual orientation.
Do not solicit or advertise.
If you have questions or comments about this forum (such as technical difficulties or performance issues), please contact your forum administrator for the appropriate channel for your inquiry.
Moderation
Any post that violates the above conditions, or departs from the intended purpose of this forum may be removed without notice by the administration.
We reserve the right to edit any post for reasons including, but not limited to: language, length, or content not appropriate to the topic of this forum.
Older threads or messages may be removed from time to time, to main to maintain categories or threads of manageable length.
Any member who breaches these Guidelines through hostile, abusive or other inappropriate behavior may find their account privileges revoked.
Privacy
Remember that this is a public forum, and you have no guarantee or expectation of privacy. Your post could be read by anyone.
Posts can be traced. We record information about every user of this forum, and will honor any court orders or requests by recognized law authorities for information about individuals posting libelous material.
All communications on this board are deemed to by public and not private communications. We reserve the right to remove without notice any message posted for any reason, but we have no obligation to remove content you find objectionable.
Regarding your email address and other personal information
Although we require your email address for verification purposes, we recommend that you do not post it or any other personal information such, as phone numbers or your home address. Your posts can be searched by bots or third parties that have no affiliation with the administrator of this forum.
Disclaimer
The views expressed by members of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the administrator or other members. Each member is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.
Please report any activity that you notice which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the management immediately.
"to really help the planet, we have to go nuclear, fast" - Geldof
Kill or cure, I guess. I'm not sure it will help the planet nor I guess do the former residents of Chernobyl. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster Maybe nuclear power is unavoidable, but I think the alternatives, even if they are Mickey Mouse, need to examined. Given that the UK has simply just stockpiled its highly radioactive nuclear waste at Sellafield (or simply let it leak into the Irish sea!) expanding the nuclear program would be pretty reckless.
Someone buy him a copy of Cornelia Hesse-Honegger's "Heteroptera", which has detailed drawings of all the horrible insect mutations that are around the Sellafield (formerly known as Windscale) nuclear plant in Cumbria (that's the Lake District of England to our non British readers). She found the places with the highest incidence of deformities were in the areas close to Sellafield and in the main wind directions (Drigg, Calder Bridge, Ponsonby and of course Seascale).
Then let's hear him say that nuke energy's the way to go. Yeah, if you want babies like Zaphoid Beeblebrox!
__________________
If you can smile in the midst of pain
And laugh at the cares of mankind
You're out of the mire
You're out of the rain
And you're probably out of your mind
Well I suppose he wont be doing a cover of 'Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Russian Roulette' any time in the near future.
Pretty disappointed in what he said, especially as he endorses a panacea which has a half life of 250,000 years - and rubbishes the alternatives.
He contradicts himself, as he is once quoted as saying 'Mankind at its most desperate is often at its best.'
Me, I think he should update the lyrics to 'Another piece of red', using the words 'joined my atlas' instead of 'left'. Obviously, the 'red' would be a new nuclear power station.
nick
-- Edited by TheTopHat at 23:44, 2008-01-12
__________________
there you go, big hand for the boomtown rats, music will never be the same again, i think........
I'm with both of you on this one and definitely not with Bob.
Nuclear is not the way. Whilst accidents are rare they are very costly in terms of lives and I'd have thought Bob might be concerned by that. It isn't the greenest form of power either!!! I thought he was advocating 'greenness'??
I don't expect to and don't agree with everything Bob says, but you are right this one is particularly disappointing.
I second what Jules has said. I find it unbelievable that Bob would promote nuclear energy. I cringe when I think of what happened in Chernobyl & what could happen at Sellafield. In my opinion the risks far outweigh any positives & it should be banned fullstop
__________________
Regards, Musicmania...
“To stop the flow of music would be like the stopping of time itself, incredible and inconceivable.” Aaron Copland.
Indeed Musicmania. The fallout is costly too in terms of livelyhoods and how widelyspread it is. I visited Turkey in 1989, they lost their teacrop amongst other things due to Chernobyl. No-one drank ordinary tea there. However, they were resourceful and used their local speciality, Apple tea.
I used to work at a local college. We had a local link with children who suffered from the fallout too. They paid for children to come over from Russia (Bellarusse) and the children were starving, poverty stricken. OK there were over factors involved but Chernobyl played its part. And again a disaster strikes an already poor area.
I suppose its the countdown to the 2018 restrictions, that Bob really refers to. Whatever the current/projected power consumption is -I doubt its a falling graph. The current power production process will be severely restricted, thus the need for alternative ideas. It looks like Britains answer is more nuclear plants. I would also say that it is the option that most other nuclear nations will take as well. So the British aren't alone, except in being honest about their intention. (Forgive me if your country has done the same -wherever you are.)
I think general awareness will only kick in when bills start coming in our doors in 2018. Will that then be too late? - decisions will have been made. I'm still p*ssed with Geldof - for jumping on the bandwagon he jumped on. He could have taken a different approach, a more typical 'geldofian' view and exposed the establishment as to their intentions on this whole shortfall in a more impactful way, which is now, yes right now, being decided for us.
I wonder has he gone to the darker side....... I hope not, but its not lookin' good.
By the way, I live in green Ireland, no nukes, we're gone. But thats another story..... Our government have been debating about lightbulbs (CFL's) for the last few weeks. How many ministers does it take to change a lightbulb?
nick
-- Edited by TheTopHat at 22:49, 2008-01-13
__________________
there you go, big hand for the boomtown rats, music will never be the same again, i think........