Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Debut Album -> Utterly Subjective Personal Opinion


V Deep

Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Date:
Debut Album -> Utterly Subjective Personal Opinion
Permalink  
 


C'mon - we haven't had any real fun since the Clash invasion!


My current review, having heard the thing only a few times now (otherwise known as I reserve the right to change my mind down the line):


Looking After #1  - Really, I'm shocked that the BTR were ever this much fun!  music A+, lyric A+


Mary Of The 4th Form - I still have only the vaguest idea of what 4th Form IS, but this track continues the brilliance.  music A/A+, lyric A+  (and I vastly prefer the album version to the single)


Close As You'll Ever Be - Not as interesting, but not bad, either.  music B/B+, lyric A


Neon Heart - Now the music is starting to annoy me in places, and the lyric isn't that great either.  music B/B-, lyric B+


Joey's On The Strret Again - Continuing the decline from brilliant to absolute crap, I think we've hit a bottom here.  I find it hard to believe how BAD this is.  The sax is downright awful, the piano doesn't work for me....and the whole endeavor is soooo long.  Can't we just cut this short and get on with things?  The only part that works for me at ALL is the bass line and quick solo.  Thanks Pete - you have no idea what a relief those few seconds were, I actually liked what you were doing!  music D, lyric C


I Can Make It If You Can - Thankfully, it's back to something fairly brilliant.  music A/A-, lyric A


Never Bite The Hand That Feeds You - And back to awful again...I think I'm getting whiplash.  What's the name of that 50's track this one is modeled after?  I'd much rather be listening to that.  music C, lyrics (unknown)


She's Gonna Do You In - And again, thankfully (except for the whiplash effect) back to something good, not a moment too soon!  music A, lyric A


Kicks - OK.  music B, lyric B


Doin' It Right - good work.  Here the piano works for me, which is a sort of redemption after Joey.  music A, lyric (unknown)


My Blues Away - LOVE THIS - I just love the energy on this track, and I needed the kick in the ass by this point.  So, who was the Stones fan?  music A+, lyric (unknown)


A Second Time - I'm still a happy girl.  Goats Head Soup wasn't my favorite Stones record, but it was still the Stones.  music A+, lyric (unknown)


Fanzine Hero - I think this one's pretty much of a mess, but I really love the piano break.  music B/B-, lyric (unknown)


Barefootin' - Seems like a fun night out. Sorry I missed it.  (Reminds me of Full House by the  J. Geils Band.) music B+, lyric (unknown) 


I'm curious to see what others think.  It seems you all love Joey, which I just do NOT understand. 



-- Edited by Tina McBain at 16:37, 2005-10-04

__________________


Back To Boomtown

Status: Offline
Posts: 7232
Date:
I like Joey's On The Street Again!
Permalink  
 



quote:






Originally posted by: franna
"Joey's On The Street Again - Continuing the decline from brilliant to absolute crap, I think we've hit a bottom here.  I find it hard to believe how BAD this is.  The sax is downright awful, the piano doesn't work for me....and the whole endeavor is soooo long.  Can't we just cut this short and get on with things?  The only part that works for me at ALL is the bass line and quick solo.  Thanks Pete - you have no idea what a relief those few seconds were, I actually liked what you were doing!  music D, lyric C 


It seems you all love Joey, which I just do NOT understand. "






I see it as a Rat Trap prototype, and part of a Dublin trilogy (ending with When the Night Comes).  Since all I'd ever heard from Bruce Springsteen prior to hearing the Rats in 1978 was the dire River, I didn't realise how much they had leant on the Boss for the trilogy.  I first heard it live on TV (probably Rock Goes to College), and thought that it was Joey rather than Rat Trap that was the new single back in 1978.


I think it is quite accomplished musically, but, as I have come to discover, a little unoriginal.  I like the bass line a lot (I always did like Pete's bass lines, good job Mutt Lange worked him hard), but I like it all.   I think it is a very good track, but I find very little to complain about on the first two albums.



-- Edited by ArrGee at 19:55, 2005-04-10

__________________

 What is this bloke talking about? 


V Deep

Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Date:
Permalink  
 

quote:

Originally posted by: ArrGee

" I see it as a Rat Trap prototype, and part of a Dublin trilogy (ending with When the Night Comes).  Since all I'd ever heard from Bruce Springsteen prior to hearing the Rats in 1978 was the dire River, I didn't realise how much they had leant on the Boss for the trilogy.  I first heard it live on TV (probably Rock Goes to College), and thought that it was Joey rather than Rat Trap that was the new single back in 1978. I think it is quite accomplished musically, but, as I have come to discover, a little unoriginal.  I like the bass line a lot (I always did like Pete's bass lines, good job Mutt Lange worked him hard), but I like it all. "


A Rat Trap prototype?  Hadn't thought of that, but yes, I suppose it IS earlier then Rat Trap.  I've just heard more OF Rat Trap (and I like the way it's evolved - my first reaction to the original was "this is a really BAD Bruce imitation."  At this point, I'm so used to Rat Trap, I barely notice the Bruce-ness anymore, and I think it's also evolved away from that a bit.).


In the early Bruce days, I wasn't much of a fan; I'm only beginning to really appreciate Bruce now (just as all my fanatical Srpingsteen fan friends are getting bored by him).  I ALWAYS loved Clarence though.  Clarence is so.....COOL.  The BTR (or Mutt) should have simply invited Clarence to London for a vacation if they wanted Bruce's sax sound.


As far as a trilogy is concerned, I haven't listened to "When the Night Comes" yet, so I will reserve my opinion.


"The dire River"?  At first I thought you were referring to Meeting Across The River from the LP Born To Run, which is an EXCELLENT track.  Now I see that you're referring to the LP "The River", with which I'm not familiar enough to have an opinion.  I was getting my dates (what came out when) messed up.  Born To Run is earlier.


Edited to add:  I don't get it.  The LP "The River" wasn't released until 1980.  Not sure if the track "The River" was released earlier as a single, but I doubt it would have been released that much earlier.  Now, (the brilliant) Meeting Across The River from Born To Run was released in 1975.  I've absolutely no idea what you think is dire, but of the likely candidates, I'll probably disagree with you (and strongly disagree).  Still, it's hard to know what you're complaining about.


Anyway, after hearing Joey, I'm glad BG made his Springsteen "joke" after playing Rat Trap.  If he'd made that remark after playing Joey, he might not have gotten out of the venue alive. 


Joey, accomplished musically?  We'll have to agree to disagree there as well.  Perhaps it has some merit on its own terms, but to me it's a staggeringly failed attempt at early Bruce.



-- Edited by franna at 21:12, 2005-04-10

-- Edited by franna at 21:28, 2005-04-10

__________________


Back To Boomtown

Status: Offline
Posts: 7232
Date:
The River
Permalink  
 


quote:

Originally posted by: franna

"  Now I see that you're referring to the LP "The River", with which I'm not familiar enough to have an opinion.  I was getting my dates (what came out when) messed up.  Born To Run is earlier. Edited to add:  I don't get it.  The LP "The River" wasn't released until 1980.  Not sure if the track "The River" was released earlier as a single, but I doubt it would have been released that much earlier.-- Edited by franna at 21:12, 2005-04-10 -- Edited by franna at 21:28, 2005-04-10"

I meant the 1980 River, which was the first time I heard Springsteen.  I found it a pretty dire track, though it was probably a couple of years after the event (as you say, but those years all merge a bit now).  That's why I never really got the Springsteen comparison thing at the time (only years later did it make sense, having heard other stuff).  As for failed Bruce copies, to be fair, the Rats only did three songs of that ilk, and Joey & Rat Trap are good tracks.  Bon Jovi are serial offenders, almost building a career in copying Springsteen.

__________________

 What is this bloke talking about? 


Drag Me Down

Status: Offline
Posts: 332
Date:
here's mine...
Permalink  
 


I also have only heard this album (referring to the re-released CD) a few times. I’m no expert at all, and have nothing to compare it to (in terms of other punk/new wave bands at the time, singles, the originally-released album, etc.) Just a few novice opinions…

My favorite track has to be A Second Time. I wish I knew the history/meaning behind this song because it has shadows of the emotion of I Can Make It If You Can in Geldof’s voice and lyrics, which is touching to me. Personally this sounds like a watered-down version of some of Ozzy’s slower stuff (“Mama I’m Comin’ Home,” “See You On the Other Side,” etc.), with its slow beat and beautiful, wailing guitar solos. Fingers’ introduction sounds a bit Charlie-Brownish but luckily, Simon and the guitars envelop the piano to produce a very lovely sound. Geldof’s a little out of tune in some places and near the end, his grating voice hurts my throat, but it all adds to, again, the emotional landscape of the song.

So it’s no surprise that I Can Make It is my second favorite. In my opinion (fran ) the guitar and tune here resembles the Stones’ “Angie,” one of my favorite Stones songs. Now the first version I heard of this was the live version from the Best Of compilation, which was good and Stones-y and all, but I was pleasantly surprised hearing this CD’s version. Geldof’s voice is void of Jagger’s vocal impression - it is more true to Geldof, and it just sounds prettier than how he sounds in the live version. My knowing the story behind the song allows me to appreciate what he’s saying to the fullest. The tempo and instrumental work (particularly the piano and guitar) makes this song easy for escapism.

While I’m on the slow-tempo angle, Kicks manages to writhe up in third place of my song placing – solely due to the 16-bar slow break about a minute and a half into the song. This comes from nowhere, I was taken aback the first time I heard it. Knowing that Geldof is not a huge Pink Floyd fan, it was surprising to hear how ‘Floydian’ those 16 bars sounded. The soft drumbeat, the wistful tune, and the backing ‘ooo-ooos’ sounded a bit like a segment of Floyd’s “The Show Must Go On,” or any other Floyd song that has those qualities. Anyway I liked the sound a lot, and it was a very strange but great break from the rest of this so-so song.

Mary of the 4th Form, Joey’s on the Street Again, Neon Heart, and Close As You’ll Ever Be are all tied in my ranks. I like all of the ‘and in the middle of the night…’ verses in Mary since they’re in a minor key as opposed to the rest of the song. Likewise, the ‘Joey did this, and Joey did that’ phrase has a good sound and the rest of the song isn’t too bad. I agree with Fran with the sax solo though, that’s very annoying and I want to tell the sax player to calm down a little or he’ll ruin the instrument!

Neon Heart and Close As are songs that have a decent tune, and good, dark, glum lyrics. They’re well-blended tracks and they’re not too ‘happy’ sounding which I enjoy. The first time I heard Close As was in the Music Machine segment of the BTR DVD, and I loved watching Bob all wild ‘n maniacal while performing the song, so now I always associate the song with those great images, which bumps the song up to this ranking.

She’s Gonna Do You In, Lookin’ After No. 1, and Never Bite the Hand that Feeds are next. They’re all just average, and while there’s nothing really gripping to me from them, they’re also not so annoying that I just want to skip ‘em. I never heard/knew what was so great about No. 1 even though it was such a huge hit of the BTR. The lyrics are decent and all but I really don’t like that Beach Boys “Wipe Out” sound to it, especially those drums, blech. But it’s full of energy and I guess that was the popular sound at the time. I’m not a big blues fan and Do You In is quite blues-y with the harmonica and everything. I do like watching Bob put all his effort & sweat into that harmonica solo, but not hearing it as much. Never Bite is just kinda ok kinda cool kinda annoying kinda whatever (that’s a great review).

The songs I really really don’t care for at all are those other bonus tracks – Bare Footin’, Fanzine Hero, Doin’ It Right, and Blues Away. Too boringly upbeat, too similar-sounding, a couple too blues-y, too much major key, and I don’t even care to figure out the lyrics b/c I dislike the tunes so much. Not even worth me separating each one & explaining why I don’t like them. No cool twists in any of them, they are just not unique and if I heard just the music (and not Bob’s distinct voice), I wouldn’t think that they were the BTR at all. Granted, the BTR have a huge variety of sound in their songs and went through a lot of different styles, but these don’t stand out to me at all. I think I’m beating a dead horse.

I just like minor-sounding songs better overall, and the BTR have made some really fine songs in the minor key, but they’re not in this album too much. This is not my favorite album, probably just more in the middle. Not embarrassingly bad, but not that great. I do like the whole bitterness that lies in most of these lyrics but again, most of the tunes are just boring to me. I’m more of a fan of their slower, ‘prettier’-sounding songs. In the Long Grass is by far my favorite BTR album, that is more of the ‘sound’ I like, while this one is too old-time-rock ‘n roll sounding for my taste…with the exception of Second Time and I Can Make It.

yea for boring readers to tears

__________________


V Deep

Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Date:
RE: The River
Permalink  
 


quote:

Originally posted by: ArrGee

"I meant the 1980 River, which was the first time I heard Springsteen.  I found it a pretty dire track ...  As for failed Bruce copies, to be fair, the Rats only did three songs of that ilk, and Joey & Rat Trap are good tracks.  Bon Jovi are serial offenders, almost building a career in copying Springsteen."


Although I'm not a diehard Bruce fan, I don't find 1980's "The River" dire, far from it.


True, the BTR apparently only tried their hand at Springsteen on three occasions (thanks be!), but as I mentioned earlier, I find Joey abysmal and Rat Trap (in its original incarnation, anyway) marginal.  I've simply gotten used to Rat Trap, and in this case familiarity has had a pleasant effect.


I've never thought of Bon Jovi as Springsteen imitators.  I never had much use for them until someone overseas convinced me to re-consider.   On reflection and an impulse purchase of the Greatest Hits CD, I'll now concede that Bon Jovi's hits can be fun on occasion.  Still, I wouldn't really call myself a fan.  


I think Bon Jovi is standard US issue arena rock, owing much more to American Top 40 in general than Bruce in particular.  They don't sound like Bruce to me at all.  There's a world of difference between highlighting Clarence Clemons' sax / Richie Sambora's guitar in your music.  Both Bon Jovi and Springsteen ARE from New Jersey, so maybe they share a bit of an accent, or worldview.  I can't speak to that.  I'm a snotty New Yorker who tries never to have to cross the bridge or tunnel over that way.  They do have nice beaches, though.  I'll give them that!  But then, so do we. 


My diehard Bruce fan-friends all claim that Bruce has the best ass in Rock n Roll.  And it's commonly accepted fact that Jon Bongiovi has the best hair.  Maybe there's something in the water over in Jersey?


Also in Bon Jovi's defense, they did a CD in which they took their greatest hits and totally re-worked and re-constructed them.  It's the only time I've heard of a band doing such a thing, and it WAS a very interesting release. 



__________________


She's So Modern

Status: Offline
Posts: 11
Date:
RE: Utterly Subjective Personal Opinion
Permalink  
 


Hi, this is just a thought...but maybe the "4th Form" is the name of the class that Mary belongs to at school? its about a student who seduces her teacher right? This explanation makes sence to me, dont know about u?

__________________
C.L.McCall


The biggest Geldof fan in the world, bar none!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6268
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mary does exist and she was someone Bob fancied at school. 4th Form was the year they were in.

__________________
Love Julesxxx
Bob's personal Hippy Angel - well in my dreams ;-)
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=709427348&ref=profile
http://www.facebook.com/BobGeldofFans


V Deep

Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Date:
Permalink  
 

quote:

Originally posted by: Jules

"4th Form was the year they were in."


I don't know where Cindy's from, but the US has no such thing as a "form."  There IS a fourth "grade", but I don't know if those are analogous.  I'd say you're probably about ... nine or ten years old in fourth grade.  Is that the same age as fourth form? 


Our educational systems are VERY different in certain respects!



__________________


The biggest Geldof fan in the world, bar none!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6268
Date:
Permalink  
 

The system has changed here in recent years, but 4th Form was around 14/15 years - one year before taking O'Levels at 15/16, 5th Form and 6th Form (if you chose to) A Levels. We called our 6th Form Upper and Lower 6th as you are in for 2 years, never 7th form - no sense at all!

__________________
Love Julesxxx
Bob's personal Hippy Angel - well in my dreams ;-)
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=709427348&ref=profile
http://www.facebook.com/BobGeldofFans


V Deep

Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Date:
Permalink  
 

We don't have O levels or A levels, and our University system is also organized quite differently.  It's more difficult than you imagine to try and follow a discussion involving education.  It seems to be more than just different names for the same thing, rather that the systems are more different than they are similar.


In any case, Mary of the Fourth Form becomes an entirely different song when you finally learn that it's written about a teenager, not a nine year old.


 



__________________


Dave

Status: Offline
Posts: 422
Date:
Permalink  
 

There's another story behind it. Those who've seen BG play live recently (with that, I mean ca. five years... ) will know this anecdote he tells the audience before "Mary".


As Jules said, there really was a girl called Mary. She became the PR to the Irish Prime Minister, Bertie Ahern. "Us Dun Laoghaire kids go far!", as BG puts it. The story he tells from the stage goes somewhat further and includes fifty pence, reportedly paid by Mary to Bob to leave her alone...


This is from an article from the Independent:


"We played in Vicar Street in Dublin a couple of years ago, and there she was: still gorgeous and still wouldn't shag me. She's married, but I didn't feel that should be an impediment. I mean, I'm an international rock star, for ****'s sake!"


(http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/low_res/story.jsp?story=605132&host=5&dir=229)




__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard