POSTING GUIDELINES
This forum is intended to provide an atmosphere of open communication, where each member can share his or her own insights and opinions. To help achieve this goal, we ask that you:
Do not post libelous or illegal material.
Do not post harassing or discriminatory comments based on race, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual orientation.
Do not solicit or advertise.
If you have questions or comments about this forum (such as technical difficulties or performance issues), please contact your forum administrator for the appropriate channel for your inquiry.
Moderation
Any post that violates the above conditions, or departs from the intended purpose of this forum may be removed without notice by the administration.
We reserve the right to edit any post for reasons including, but not limited to: language, length, or content not appropriate to the topic of this forum.
Older threads or messages may be removed from time to time, to main to maintain categories or threads of manageable length.
Any member who breaches these Guidelines through hostile, abusive or other inappropriate behavior may find their account privileges revoked.
Privacy
Remember that this is a public forum, and you have no guarantee or expectation of privacy. Your post could be read by anyone.
Posts can be traced. We record information about every user of this forum, and will honor any court orders or requests by recognized law authorities for information about individuals posting libelous material.
All communications on this board are deemed to by public and not private communications. We reserve the right to remove without notice any message posted for any reason, but we have no obligation to remove content you find objectionable.
Regarding your email address and other personal information
Although we require your email address for verification purposes, we recommend that you do not post it or any other personal information such, as phone numbers or your home address. Your posts can be searched by bots or third parties that have no affiliation with the administrator of this forum.
Disclaimer
The views expressed by members of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the administrator or other members. Each member is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.
Please report any activity that you notice which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the management immediately.
I have been watching the TV show Rockstar Inxs, and I became curious as to the death of Michael Hutchence. During my research, I found a coroner's report that details a heated conversation between Geldof and Hutchence on the morning of his death. The conversation was allegedly concerning the custody of children. Can someone ellaborate.
As much as I cannot understand INXS being involved in a reality TV show, and am appalled by the thought, I think it's natural that Marty is curious about Michael Hutchence's death.
This forum has a policy of keeping Bob's personal life 'out-of-bounds', which to a large extent I agree with. At the same time, the specific subject involving the tragedies of Michael, Paula, Tiger Lily, Bob and all those affected, is one that a lot of forum members are also naturally curious about.
I am not advocating the discussion of this in the Forum, but I do believe Marty (and possibly others) shouldn't be turned away with a "we don't talk about that here" message, fullstop. Perhaps other forum members can suggest other sources regarding this subject, such as the book by a close friend of Paula's (I think) that I irritatingly can't remember the name of (SORRY!).
It is certainly true that there was a lot of suspicion and blame of Bob re Michael's death. In fact, STILL in Australia, the "trashy magazines" (disgustingly) portray Bob as someone at fault in their periodical 'updates' of Tiger Lily.
Yet there never has been ANY substantiation of ANY accussations against Bob. Rumours and innuendo, yes, but absolutely nothing in fact.
Regarding Michael's death, "death by misadventure" is far more accurate than "suicide". Although it seems that few people can actually talk about this in public, Michael's death was almost certainly a result of his practice of 'auto asphyxiation' going dreadfully wrong. Used to enhance sexual pleasure, this behaviour is inherently dangerous, as it involves the person being virtually asphyxiated but able to stop at a point before real asphyxiation occurs. The practice is not as uncommon as it would seem, but there are many deaths resulting from it - whether these are stated as so or not.
The coroner's report would give the details of how Michael was found, together with other information. A link between Bob and Michael's death simply doesn't exist. Whether the argument you cite occurred or not is probably incidental, given the circumstances of Michael's death.
Unfortunately, the scenario of Michael's death being suicide (and therefore Bob being in some way involved, no matter how tenuous) is much neater and more acceptable than Michael engaging in behaviour of high risk, associated with sex, where the line was crossed.
I encourage Marty to pursue his curiosity, and hope some sources come to light. Any personal information regarding Bob won't appear in this forum; he is fully entitled to chose what he wants, or otherwise, to be made public.
Just one more comment: as much as Michael Hutchence's death may make you curious, make sure you try some of his life - INXS, with Michael on lead vocals, was one fantastic band with some unforgettable songs.
PS I really hope I don't get into trouble with this post!!
This forum has a policy of keeping Bob's personal life 'out-of-bounds', which to a large extent I agree with. At the same time, the specific subject involving the tragedies of Michael, Paula, Tiger Lily, Bob and all those affected, is one that a lot of forum members are also naturally curious about. I am not advocating the discussion of this in the Forum, but I do believe Marty (and possibly others) shouldn't be turned away with a "we don't talk about that here" message, fullstop. PS I really hope I don't get into trouble with this post!!
Oddly enough, this subject isn't out of bounds.
I think there should be respect for Geldof's personal life, but a lot of this is in the public domain, so it can be discussed. The only thing to be careful is not to write anything that could be libellous, such as unsubstantited rumours/gossip and making them out to be fact.
I'm amazed it too so long for anyone to post on this. You are a very respectful bunch.
PS Tina/Ian may have different boundaries, if so they can state what would be acceptable.
Issues of custody and access can be very problematic for lots of people, leading to heated arguments between the parents and parent's new partners frequently. I should know. My parents parted when I was twelve and there was major conflict, made worse by the fact I lived with my Dad in a different country (thousands of miles away) from my mother.
That one such argument would lead the partner of an involved parent to commit suicide is the implication here. As Julia has said, that would be to assume Michael had actually committed suicide, which even Paula Yates thought highly unlikely. Didn't she campaign for that death by misadventure verdict?
People do irrational things when they've taken a lot of drugs and alcohol, and that that was the case the night Michael Hutchence died is fact.
A sad loss for his partner, child and bandmates for sure.
There was no suicide note. Most people who deliberately take their own lives do actually write a note. It would have been very unusual for this not to have happened. We will never know the real truth but I think it was accident.
It was a sad loss for all of his friends and family.
People do irrational things when they've taken a lot of drugs and alcohol, and that that was the case the night Michael Hutchence died is fact.
A sad loss for his partner, child and bandmates for sure.
As far as I know, the following are also fact; INXS were back in Australia rehearsing for a major tour; Michael's behaviour during the daytime rehearsal before his death was described by the other band members and entourage was that of a vibrant, energetic person who was keenly anticipating the upcoming tour; this was confirmed by video tapes of the rehearsal session.
Also (as far as I know); Michael was found alone in a hotel room, slumped against the door (possibly naked) with a belt around his neck that was attached to the doorknob; there had been people coming and going from the hotel room that night, partying with lots of alcohol and drugs (I'm fairly sure there was evidence of cocaine, amongst others); Michael's behaviour was not seen by the partygoers as being out-of-character; the time that Michael was on his own - between the last guests leaving and the time of death - was relatively short (in other words, Michael was not alone for hours before he died).
And as matters of fact, Michael was in a commited relationship (presumably a loving one), and was the relatively new father of a beautiful girl.
So, go figure.
Or, as I think whenever I listen to INXS, WHY MICHAEL? Why did you take the risks? Of course those are rhetorical questions, and I'm with Jules in that we'll never really know the truth.