POSTING GUIDELINES
This forum is intended to provide an atmosphere of open communication, where each member can share his or her own insights and opinions. To help achieve this goal, we ask that you:
Do not post libelous or illegal material.
Do not post harassing or discriminatory comments based on race, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual orientation.
Do not solicit or advertise.
If you have questions or comments about this forum (such as technical difficulties or performance issues), please contact your forum administrator for the appropriate channel for your inquiry.
Moderation
Any post that violates the above conditions, or departs from the intended purpose of this forum may be removed without notice by the administration.
We reserve the right to edit any post for reasons including, but not limited to: language, length, or content not appropriate to the topic of this forum.
Older threads or messages may be removed from time to time, to main to maintain categories or threads of manageable length.
Any member who breaches these Guidelines through hostile, abusive or other inappropriate behavior may find their account privileges revoked.
Privacy
Remember that this is a public forum, and you have no guarantee or expectation of privacy. Your post could be read by anyone.
Posts can be traced. We record information about every user of this forum, and will honor any court orders or requests by recognized law authorities for information about individuals posting libelous material.
All communications on this board are deemed to by public and not private communications. We reserve the right to remove without notice any message posted for any reason, but we have no obligation to remove content you find objectionable.
Regarding your email address and other personal information
Although we require your email address for verification purposes, we recommend that you do not post it or any other personal information such, as phone numbers or your home address. Your posts can be searched by bots or third parties that have no affiliation with the administrator of this forum.
Disclaimer
The views expressed by members of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the administrator or other members. Each member is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.
Please report any activity that you notice which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the management immediately.
I've seen you in the markets I've seen you in the streets And at your political convention Talking of your crusade Talking of your nation And other things too terrible to mention And you proclaim your Christianity You proclaim your love of God You talk of apple pie and mom Well I've just got one question And I want an answer Tell me, who would Jesus bomb?
Maybe Jesus would bomb the Syrians 'Cause they're not Jews like him Maybe Jesus would bomb the Afghans On some kind of vengeful whim Maybe Jesus would drive an M1 tank And he would shoot Saddam Tell me, who would Jesus bomb?
I've seen you on the TV And on the battleships I've seen you in the house upon the hill And I've heard you talking About making the world safer And about all the men you have to kill And you speak so glibly About your civilization And how you have the moral higher ground While halfway around the world Your explosives smash the buildings Ah, if you could only hear the sound
But maybe Jesus would sell land mines And turn on his electric chair Maybe Jesus would show no compassion For his enemies in the lands way over there Maybe Jesus would have flown the planes That killed the kids in Viet Nam Tell me, who would Jesus bomb
Yes I hear you shout with confidence As you praise the lord And you talk about this God you know so well And you talk of Armageddon And your final victory When all the evil forces go to hell Well you'd best hope you've chosen wisely On the right side of the lord And when you die your conscience it is clear You'd best hope that your atom bombs Are better than the sword At the time when your reckoning is here
'Cause I don't think Jesus would send gunships into Bethlehem Or jets to raze the towns of Timorese I don't think Jesus would lend money to dictators Or drive those SUV's And I don't think Jesus would ever have dropped A single ounce of napalm So tell me, who would Jesus bomb?
For any Christian who has ever supported any war - ever - I propose this question to you.
is it somehow worse when a religious person wants to bomb somone/something, than it is when someone who isn't religious wants to bomb someone/something? sure, religion is supposed to be about love and understanding and whatnot..but, isn't that what most people, religious or not, want?
just a question, not getting into an argument here...
who's the guy who wrote that anyway? bless his heart for trying, but.. if you're looking for satire, then check out frank zappa...here are some quotes for ya: http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/zappa.htm
Of course, though Jesus may well have existed, as the son of a carpenter (like me), he would never have got anywhere near having that sort of power in his life. But if Jesus is part of the holy trinity, then he's obviously up to no good...
One of the delegates, Nabil Shaath, who was Palestinian foreign minister at the time, said: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I am driven with a mission from God'. God would tell me, 'George go and fight these terrorists in Afghanistan'. And I did. And then God would tell me 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq'. And I did."
Mr Bush went on: "And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, 'Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East'. And, by God, I'm gonna do it."
"is it somehow worse when a religious person wants to bomb somone/something, than it is when someone who isn't religious wants to bomb someone/something?"
Yes, because the religious person, unless in a strange hatred-driven religion (not Islam), supposedly lives by principles and values against violence, war, and murder.
Johanna:"is it somehow worse when a religious person wants to bomb somone/something, than it is when someone who isn't religious wants to bomb someone/something?"
meekus: Yes, because the religious person, unless in a strange hatred-driven religion (not Islam), supposedly lives by principles and values against violence, war, and murder.
yeah....meekus, that's what we all supposedly do isn't it? just because someone's not religious it doesn't mean that they do not have principles against violence and so forth... interesting question..
"yeah....meekus, that's what we all supposedly do isn't it? just because someone's not religious it doesn't mean that they do not have principles against violence and so forth... interesting question.."
Not instigate anything further, but I never implied such.
What I was pointing out is that by basic principles (forget politics, excuses, revenge, etc.), the majority of religions are peaceful. If a leader calls himself a "compassionate conservative" and then bombs the hell out of foreign countries, it seems backwards. Not even in a complicated way, very basic.
Not instigate anything further, but I never implied such.
you didn't? well, that's kinda what you did, but nevermind, let's not even go there...
What I was pointing out is that by basic principles (forget politics, excuses, revenge, etc.), the majority of religions are peaceful. If a leader calls himself a "compassionate conservative" and then bombs the hell out of foreign countries, it seems backwards.
that's exactly my point! all humans try to live by those "basic principles" right? we all want peace and harmony... so when a leader who is religious, bombs some other country...why should we be more outraged, or confused or some other fitting word, than we would have been had the leader been non-religous? it's always "backwards" to bomb isn't it?
Your idea makes sense. But because America has never seen a non-Christian president, and doubtfully will for some time, there's no way to know of the reaction.
Of course I'll always be outraged of wars. But it seems unnecessarily backwards for him to go out of his way and declare himself conservative (STILL!) under the very non-Christian circumstances involved.
Having said that all very formally, Bush sucks wang.
But because America has never seen a non-Christian president, and doubtfully will for some time, there's no way to know of the reaction.
true..
Of course I'll always be outraged of wars. But it seems unnecessarily backwards for him to go out of his way and declare himself conservative (STILL!) under the very non-Christian circumstances involved.
well, do you really expect Bush to make sense? he's not the sharpest tool in the box is he..However, if I was christian I'd be very offended by him calling himself christian..