POSTING GUIDELINES
This forum is intended to provide an atmosphere of open communication, where each member can share his or her own insights and opinions. To help achieve this goal, we ask that you:
Do not post libelous or illegal material.
Do not post harassing or discriminatory comments based on race, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual orientation.
Do not solicit or advertise.
If you have questions or comments about this forum (such as technical difficulties or performance issues), please contact your forum administrator for the appropriate channel for your inquiry.
Moderation
Any post that violates the above conditions, or departs from the intended purpose of this forum may be removed without notice by the administration.
We reserve the right to edit any post for reasons including, but not limited to: language, length, or content not appropriate to the topic of this forum.
Older threads or messages may be removed from time to time, to main to maintain categories or threads of manageable length.
Any member who breaches these Guidelines through hostile, abusive or other inappropriate behavior may find their account privileges revoked.
Privacy
Remember that this is a public forum, and you have no guarantee or expectation of privacy. Your post could be read by anyone.
Posts can be traced. We record information about every user of this forum, and will honor any court orders or requests by recognized law authorities for information about individuals posting libelous material.
All communications on this board are deemed to by public and not private communications. We reserve the right to remove without notice any message posted for any reason, but we have no obligation to remove content you find objectionable.
Regarding your email address and other personal information
Although we require your email address for verification purposes, we recommend that you do not post it or any other personal information such, as phone numbers or your home address. Your posts can be searched by bots or third parties that have no affiliation with the administrator of this forum.
Disclaimer
The views expressed by members of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the administrator or other members. Each member is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.
Please report any activity that you notice which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the management immediately.
Thing about reviews is we like them when they suit us. Guy on Cork music forum called the Rats 'sub new wave' and the 'worst kind of derivative music' you could find.
In the end you just have to trust your own opinion. Having said that I generally read the critics, mainly music and film just to get an inclination of what they think. Sometimes they are right, and at other times you just scratch your head and wonder.
-- Edited by noelindublin on Saturday 13th of July 2013 08:05:20 PM
Just leafing through the NME from June 1978 in the garden, cool beer, warm sun and golden review of ATFTT:
'A beaming beacon in the murk of rock and roll
No two ways about - the boy's good
A marked development on the auspicious debut album
Like Clockwork is a well-constructed powerful pop song, the dense layers of musical and vocal effects meshing in a frenetic Sparks-like maelstrom of sound
Eva Braun is perfect, an extraordinary song with a nostalgic beer-hausen piano piece, military drumming and wistful whistling and an anonymous lady murmurs 'gee' at the end and you can't help but agree
Rat Trap is epic, an urban nightmare of a number that rivals 'Joey' for sheer weight and substance
At the death, the Rats still rule and whether you call it pop, rock or modern music, it's got bloody big balls'
The grey cloud on this fantastically sunny day is, they think, Living in an island. 'A half-assed reggae / rock number, too clever and not clever enough. 10cc without the puns'.
Give me clever any day of the week, Chalkie Davies. It could happen to you. No it won't, happen to you.
I have a plethora of reviews from all the mags nme etc and the rats always had positive reviews,butl like Noel says everyone has there own take on things,its a difference of opinions which makes life interesting.
I personally think album one was and is the best but I also love v deep,I think Storm Breaks should have been on greatest hits ,but I bet some people think differently.
I'm just thankful they reformed makes me feel 17 all over again.
Loving it long may it continue..
I have a plethora of reviews from all the mags nme etc and the rats always had positive reviews
Far from it, especially after Tonic. Granted the first two albums were generally very well received but the vitriol became quite marked after 1980 as the band experimented more and Geldof's celebrity grew. This was a review from Smash Hits from 1979 for Surfacing:
'Here we go again. Look, this exceedingly tiresome record 'borrows' so heavily from Bowie and Springsteen that you might as well buy 'Hunky Dory and 'Darkness on the Edge of Town' and have two genuine articles rather than none. Much frantic activity - signifying absolutely nothing - the most overrated band of the century. Awful cover as well. Best tracks 'Keep it up' and 'Nothing happened today' 3 out of 10'.
It is great to have them back albeit with just 4 original members and the reviews second time around have again been generally positive. But on these islands, we love nothing better than building people up only to knock them down later on.
Whatever about Bowie I don't get the Springsteen comparison(Re Surfacing) Not even the usual Pavlovs dog response of the music critics when they hear a piece of sax, and think nobody but Bruce Springsteen can write about life in an urban environment. Doubt Springsteen could have written Someones Looking At You.
Just my theory, but I suspect and have no proof, that the sax bit on Rat Trap was more likely to have been dreamt up by Mutt Lange than Bob Geldof. Rat Trap and Born To Run may have some thematic links, but most of the criticism I come across is from clueless Americans who judge a song just because it has a vague hint of a more well known (Born To Run?) song. Maybe if there was no sax on Rat Trap people would no be so quick to make lazy comparisons.
Of course most of these Springsteenites probably never heard of Dr feelgood, who the Rats were always willing to thank for inspiration. Anyway Smash Hits was for people too lazy or incompetent to read the NME (not that that is a complement to the NME). NME critic once called XTC's classic album Skylarking 'about as relevant as Cardinal Wolsey' (lol)
If you ask most music fans are they swayed by critics, most probably would say 'no'.
-- Edited by noelindublin on Monday 15th of July 2013 01:25:34 PM
-- Edited by noelindublin on Monday 15th of July 2013 01:31:16 PM
I have a plethora of reviews from all the mags nme etc and the rats always had positive reviews
Far from it, especially after Tonic. Granted the first two albums were generally very well received but the vitriol became quite marked after 1980 as the band experimented more and Geldof's celebrity grew. This was a review from Smash Hits from 1979 for Surfacing:
'Here we go again. Look, this exceedingly tiresome record 'borrows' so heavily from Bowie and Springsteen that you might as well buy 'Hunky Dory and 'Darkness on the Edge of Town' and have two genuine articles rather than none. Much frantic activity - signifying absolutely nothing - the most overrated band of the century. Awful cover as well. Best tracks 'Keep it up' and 'Nothing happened today' 3 out of 10'.
It is great to have them back albeit with just 4 original members and the reviews second time around have again been generally positive. But on these islands, we love nothing better than building people up only to knock them down later on.
Mark L wrote:the most overrated band of the century. Awful cover as well.
Overrated? I don't think that accusation could ever stick.
But to be fair, It was an awful album cover. I never liked the album title either. Surfacing just calls to mind laying down tarmac. And as for The Fine Art.... Still I suppose it wasn't as bad as Zenyatta Mondatta. That was total cr@p.
Mark L wrote:the most overrated band of the century. Awful cover as well.
Overrated? I don't think that accusation could ever stick.
But to be fair, It was an awful album cover. I never liked the album title either. Surfacing just calls to mind laying down tarmac. And as for The Fine Art.... Still I suppose it wasn't as bad as Zenyatta Mondatta. That was total cr@p.
I like the title, and I like Geldof's analogy of being like a drowning man, just getting to the surface in time to prevent death-' but I keep coming up, with time enough to breath....' Radiohead called their album The Bends , so diving/drowning metaphors are pretty ok by me.
Thought it was a good title tho the cover was a bit pony,tho I do have the T-shirt for this albeit to small.
Actually rated this 4th best or their 6 albums thought v deep was better than this,tho it does have its moments.
I think we all agree the long grass was by far the poorest,can't touch the self titled as this to me as just about everything that music was abt in them Days,pure quality up there with some of the best...
The latter poll allows multiple selection hence percentages don't add up, but I think it is more reflective of the relative status of the albums. People who like the debut, like me, are probably likely to have it as their second favorite album ahead of the others. Also because Surfacing was the most widely distributed album it has probably been heard by a wider demographic. Same overall result, but the debut is closer to Surfacing.
Surfacing and Tonic are usually neck and neck with me, with Surfacing edging it every now and again. I think Surfacing was a confident, stick your jaw out, look at us album and I am delighted My Picture has made it on to the new Greatest Hits cd. If ever there were a more astonishing mid-guitar break in a pop song from the late 70s/early 80s, I have yet to hear it. Live versions I have heard of this song are amazing.
By contrast, I thought Nothing Happened Today was quite an average track, saved only by the Harry Hooper segment, although I had mates at the time who thought it trivialised the song and made it 'naff' - a very 1980's word!
Keep it Up is another brilliant song. Or 'ace' as we used to say in 1980.....!
I'm amazed that the grass Album is more popular than mondo and v deep fo me the album only as 4 good songs ,the rest r fillers,mondo as its moments as does v deep both with more depth than grass,grass is the only album that as songs on it that I skip on my iPod,
Only my opinion ,I prefer songs with a bit of oomph to em.
I'm in the mood to mambo and gve my mondo a spin on the turn table tonight jus to annoy the mrs.
I generally prefer Mondo Bongo to Grass, chiefly because Go Man Go, Banana Republic and Graveyard are exceptional tracks and I don't think anything on Grass touches them, although Drag Me Down and Dave come close. I prefer Grass to V Deep on balance though. Only V Deep contains really poor tracks (Charmed Lives, the Little Death etc) yet it astonishes in places too, such as He Watches it all, House on Fire and Million Years. Since the thread was review-orientated, Record Mirror described V Deep as 'mediocre with flashes of Geldof genius' - this is it's problem - it's an inconsistent record that veers all over the place - experimentation gone wild - whereas Grass was a much better effort with a distinctive, consistent sound and which ought to have done a lot better.
In the interview with Bob Harris, flagged up elsewhere on this site, there's far too much homage paid to Elvis Costello and Mutt Lange in respect of ATFTT. Can't understand why, as he ages, Bob seems happy to reduce the credit he should take for this fine album.