POSTING GUIDELINES
This forum is intended to provide an atmosphere of open communication, where each member can share his or her own insights and opinions. To help achieve this goal, we ask that you:
Do not post libelous or illegal material.
Do not post harassing or discriminatory comments based on race, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual orientation.
Do not solicit or advertise.
If you have questions or comments about this forum (such as technical difficulties or performance issues), please contact your forum administrator for the appropriate channel for your inquiry.
Moderation
Any post that violates the above conditions, or departs from the intended purpose of this forum may be removed without notice by the administration.
We reserve the right to edit any post for reasons including, but not limited to: language, length, or content not appropriate to the topic of this forum.
Older threads or messages may be removed from time to time, to main to maintain categories or threads of manageable length.
Any member who breaches these Guidelines through hostile, abusive or other inappropriate behavior may find their account privileges revoked.
Privacy
Remember that this is a public forum, and you have no guarantee or expectation of privacy. Your post could be read by anyone.
Posts can be traced. We record information about every user of this forum, and will honor any court orders or requests by recognized law authorities for information about individuals posting libelous material.
All communications on this board are deemed to by public and not private communications. We reserve the right to remove without notice any message posted for any reason, but we have no obligation to remove content you find objectionable.
Regarding your email address and other personal information
Although we require your email address for verification purposes, we recommend that you do not post it or any other personal information such, as phone numbers or your home address. Your posts can be searched by bots or third parties that have no affiliation with the administrator of this forum.
Disclaimer
The views expressed by members of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the administrator or other members. Each member is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.
Please report any activity that you notice which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the management immediately.
Isn't that Christmas card scene a ****take of the Tonic cover?Reindeer standing in for the tiger. Very clever. They even got all the guys in the right places, and yes I did check.
-- Edited by noelindublin on Thursday 20th of November 2014 02:43:42 PM
Isn't that Christmas card scene a ****take of the Tonic cover?Reindeer standing in for the tiger. Very clever.
Genius I wonder who's idea it was.
Do you think The Jam or The Clash would dress up in Christmas costumes. Either the Rats didn't take themselves too seriously, or else they would do anything for fame?
Isn't that Christmas card scene a ****take of the Tonic cover?Reindeer standing in for the tiger. Very clever.
Genius I wonder who's idea it was.
Do you think The Jam or The Clash would dress up in Christmas costumes. Either the Rats didn't take themselves too seriously, or else they would do anything for fame?
Isn't that Christmas card scene a ****take of the Tonic cover?Reindeer standing in for the tiger. Very clever. They even got all the guys in the right places, and yes I did check.
Yes, but a bit half-hearted. They should have really went for it with the mirror image and a night time scene in the background. In fact, should have done it as a complimentary live LP called A Stocking for Santa
Do you think The Jam or The Clash would dress up in Christmas costumes. Either the Rats didn't take themselves too seriously, or else they would do anything for fame?
Dunno about them, but if it's good enough for The Beatles and The Stones, then it's fine for The Rats
Isn't that Christmas card scene a ****take of the Tonic cover?Reindeer standing in for the tiger. Very clever. They even got all the guys in the right places, and yes I did check.
Yes, but a bit half-hearted. They should have really went for it with the mirror image and a night time scene in the background. In fact, should have done it as a complimentary live LP called A Stocking for Santa
January - Mark L posts about TOTP appearance for someone's looking at you subject to dodgy DJs.
February - Arrgee bangs on about Julian cope and bores the ar$e off everyone
March - geldof plays Irish pub in the middle of the fcuking desert.
May - everyone solves suss's quizzes in ten minutes having had months of practise.
June - hallelujah the rats are playing!
Living onion island - well done Suss, one of the best we've ever had in this connection.
Also like the Q1 Q2 predictions, although regulars Jules, JofA, MATT, Noel and maybe one or two others may be disappointed they were not name checked in ArrGee's parody of posters' predictability!
PS - We're ok for Someone's Looking as Mike Read and Steve Wright were at the respective helms. As long as Readie doesn't do another calypso style UKIP-supporting ditty and Wrightie doesn't turn out to have been a wrong 'un, we'll see the Rats at 44 and 8.
Now what the hell will I post about in January? Rhetorical question, thank you!
-- Edited by Mark L on Saturday 22nd of November 2014 04:23:05 AM
January/February is usually (if you can call 2 years usually) the time the Rats announce their tour. That will be the topic for a good few weeks. Prior to that predictions of where they might play. Will they do Ireland? How successful will it be? And so on.
January/February is usually (if you can call 2 years usually) the time the Rats announce their tour. That will be the topic for a good few weeks. Prior to that predictions of where they might play. Will they do Ireland? How successful will it be? And so on.
I think it is mainly the festivals, but a few have already gone up.
as for the predictability of posters, I didn't mean to omit anyone in particular, just it got late and thought I'd send. They were just off the top of my head.
still at least the quiet periods are shorter now. For a couple of years it was just Jules and me banging on about nothing. Even we were flagging just before The Rats first reformation. I think this forum would be long dead but for that.
Jules wrote:For a couple of years it was just Jules and me banging on about nothing. Even we were flagging just before The Rats first reformation. I think this forum would be long dead but for that.
Speak for yourself . I can't even remember what I have been banging on about though. It probably was nothing.
I take my hat of to you both.I for one thought that rat fans had become like dinosaurs (A thing of the past). How wrong was I to be. Great to have gotten to know some of you. Turns out I was not the only rats fan left in Ireland or the UK for that matter
Santa's reindeer were first named in "A Visit from St. Nicholas" (better known by its first line, "Twas the Night Before Christmas") in 1823. In the original printing, the final two reindeers'[sic] names are Dunder and Blixem, which are Dutch for "thunder and lightning." In an 1844 printing by Clement Clarke Moore, who is credited as being the author, these names are changed to Donder and Blitzen.
(This figures into a debate over whether Moore really wrote the poem in question, which is too complicated to get into here.)
The 1949 song "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" calls them Donner and Blitzen, which are German for "thunder and lightning." This is how they're most widely known today.
Santa's reindeer were first named in "A Visit from St. Nicholas" (better known by its first line, "Twas the Night Before Christmas") in 1823. In the original printing, the final two reindeers'[sic] names are Dunder and Blixem, which are Dutch for "thunder and lightning." In an 1844 printing by Clement Clarke Moore, who is credited as being the author, these names are changed to Donder and Blitzen.
Apologies. Dunder, Donder, Donner, that reindeer doesn't know who he is!
My trivia question probably has a thousand variants.