POSTING GUIDELINES
This forum is intended to provide an atmosphere of open communication, where each member can share his or her own insights and opinions. To help achieve this goal, we ask that you:
Do not post libelous or illegal material.
Do not post harassing or discriminatory comments based on race, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual orientation.
Do not solicit or advertise.
If you have questions or comments about this forum (such as technical difficulties or performance issues), please contact your forum administrator for the appropriate channel for your inquiry.
Moderation
Any post that violates the above conditions, or departs from the intended purpose of this forum may be removed without notice by the administration.
We reserve the right to edit any post for reasons including, but not limited to: language, length, or content not appropriate to the topic of this forum.
Older threads or messages may be removed from time to time, to main to maintain categories or threads of manageable length.
Any member who breaches these Guidelines through hostile, abusive or other inappropriate behavior may find their account privileges revoked.
Privacy
Remember that this is a public forum, and you have no guarantee or expectation of privacy. Your post could be read by anyone.
Posts can be traced. We record information about every user of this forum, and will honor any court orders or requests by recognized law authorities for information about individuals posting libelous material.
All communications on this board are deemed to by public and not private communications. We reserve the right to remove without notice any message posted for any reason, but we have no obligation to remove content you find objectionable.
Regarding your email address and other personal information
Although we require your email address for verification purposes, we recommend that you do not post it or any other personal information such, as phone numbers or your home address. Your posts can be searched by bots or third parties that have no affiliation with the administrator of this forum.
Disclaimer
The views expressed by members of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the administrator or other members. Each member is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.
Please report any activity that you notice which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the management immediately.
With the summer gigs over I wonder what the next move, if any, from the band will be? The only thing scheduled, albeit up in the air, is the prospective 40Th anniversary gig sometime in the next few months.
My hope is that the band would continue to play, although on a much less intense touring schedule. Certainly they deserve a big break, and over the last few years we got more than we dared to dream of in terms of live gigs. Geldof to his credit didn't do it in half measures so the comeback was full on and with total dedication and much hard work. That goes for all the band and behind the scenes crew.
All I'm hoping for is a few gigs next summer and maybe an ep with 4 good songs worthy of the bands reputation. Nice to believe they still have an album in them but we'll just have to wait and see on that one. I'm intrigued to know if Geldof, who claims he is always writing songs, will go for a Rats comeback album or another solo effort.
There is no suggestion that they won't continue, just having a break.
I'm sure all that travelling takes it's toll. Must be lots of late nights and early mornings on the 2468 motorway. Also the air connections particularly for Bob Pete and Alan as the do a lot of European dates as well. But as they say about playing in a band, it beats work any day.
-- Edited by noelindublin on Wednesday 16th of September 2015 02:44:46 PM
They are all pushing on a bit now. So yes an album would be nice plus a few tight gigs. But as Lennon once said when the Beatles broke up,you have got the records to look back on. So enjoy.
It's a shame there aren't any gigs for the rest of the year, though that 40th anniversary gig may yet take place. Last year's tour seemed to indicate that it would be an annual event to do a few dates after the festivals. I wouldn't say their schedule has been that intense. ignoring the solo gigs, 16 dates from May to September, mostly at weekends isn't that heavy. Maybe the money isn't there this time around.
I see no reason why they wouldn't return next summer for more festival appearances as they are guaranteed paydays. There are still a few, particularly Glastonbury, that they could do.
As for recording, I doubt that will happen. Two (or maybe all four) of the Ratsh!t ep songs were made for the hits album. I don't think they would release another retrospective after releasing three. including the box of the 6 LPs, in the last couple of years. I suspect the only profit made from the ep itself came from the sales of the 10" vinyl as I don't imagine there were that many downloads. Maybe Geldof has a few songs tucked away that they could record, but I can't see Universal putting any effort into releasing them.
PS So Modern is now selling for £1.99 on amazon.co.uk - free delivery on prime or if you spend enough
It's a shame there aren't any gigs for the rest of the year, though that 40th anniversary gig may yet take place. Last year's tour seemed to indicate that it would be an annual event to do a few dates after the festivals. I wouldn't say their schedule has been that intense. ignoring the solo gigs, 16 dates from May to September, mostly at weekends isn't that heavy. Maybe the money isn't there this time around.
I see no reason why they wouldn't return next summer for more festival appearances as they are guaranteed paydays. There are still a few, particularly Glastonbury, that they could do.
As for recording, I doubt that will happen. Two (or maybe all four) of the Ratsh!t ep songs were made for the hits album. I don't think they would release another retrospective after releasing three. including the box of the 6 LPs, in the last couple of years. I suspect the only profit made from the ep itself came from the sales of the 10" vinyl as I don't imagine there were that many downloads. Maybe Geldof has a few songs tucked away that they could record, but I can't see Universal putting any effort into releasing them.
PS So Modern is now selling for £1.99 on amazon.co.uk - free delivery on prime or if you spend enough
Whatever about recording even if the had just one actually good new song and did it live I could live with that. Geldof seems happy to articulate his concerns and slight paranoia ad nauseum verbally(google, obama, facebook, cctv) but not to put those 'concerns' into songs.
But he is a songwriter in the end and I think something will eventually turn up.
Whatever about recording even if the had just one actually good new song and did it live I could live with that. Geldof seems happy to articulate his concerns and slight paranoia ad nauseum verbally(google, obama, facebook, cctv) but not to put those 'concerns' into songs.
But he is a songwriter in the end and I think something will eventually turn up.
I suppose he could do new songs live. I'd say that would be more likely in his solo guise. Ultimately there is nothing stopping him making music and releasing it online, but as the last thirty years or so have shown, he's not particularly prolific. Seems to be about nine years between albums (1992,2001,2010) nowadays, so expect something in 2019.
Not all of them. They have a very young, energetic member of the band. Darren has enough energy to drive them all. He is incredible!
You have a point. But he's not a Ra.t He's a blow in
What is a blow in? Darren has been in the Rats for over seven years now. Longer than one of the original members. Longer than Ringo Starr was in The Beatles...
I blow in Is a stand in. I know where your coming from But he's not a Rat. he does fit in well and is great to watch live but at the end of the day he is still a blow in
Getting to Ireland from the island of Jutland is a pain in the rear.I will have to go via Frankfurt to make the Dublin concert.Now off to beg to the mrs......
As far as I'm concerned both Alan and Darren are fully fledged Rats. They both fit well and are a good part of the band. Doubt they'd have as much energy without Darren. It wouldn't be the same without them now.
For me the only one missing in this line up Is Fingers As Cott had well jumped ship. I'm not saying anything bad about them both. They do fit in well. But they are not Rats
As far as I'm concerned both Alan and Darren are fully fledged Rats. They both fit well and are a good part of the band. Doubt they'd have as much energy without Darren. It wouldn't be the same without them now.
You could have an alternative Rats made up up Barton, Bradbury, Odlum, Beale, Moloney* and Dunn.
Personally, I see Pete Barton and especially Darren Beale as fully fledged Rats as they were the original reformers, less so Alan Dunn as he is merely a "blow in" from Geldof's solo band. Bob Bradbury was a bit of a blow in as well as his band is Hello. Dave Maloney merely filled in during Simon's sabbatical, and from what I have read Mike Odlum was a stopgap post-Barton/pre-Bradbury.
... funnily enough that's what Dr. Feelgood did replacing band members over time. Three of the current band have been in it longer than any of the originals.
I saw a rockumentary on Blondie recently when they were inducted into the Hall of Fame back in 2006 when Debbie Harry and Chris Stein refused to let Nigel Harrison and Frank Infante join them on stage. Stein said, "Our bass player Lee Fox has been working with me and Debbie for 20 years. I worked with Nigel Harrison for maybe four-and-a-half." MiaoW!
The Beatles made the big time with Ringo. Not any other drummer. That's the differents. For me any way
They got their recording contract with EMI before Ringo came on board. Pete Best was thrown out by Brian Epstein after his ineptness on the original recording. Love Me Do was recorded twice. A session drummer provided the drums on the single version of Love Me Do though due to a pressing error some of the early singles had Ringo's effort. Apparently Ringo hates the A side, but thinks the B side is pretty good
For me the only one missing in this line up Is Fingers As Cott had well jumped ship.
By the time Cott had jumped ship it was mostly over. I'm not sure if he made any contribution to V Deep, but he may have being involved on some of the songs were initially written for Mondo Bongo. I suppose reading between the lines of Visconti's biography there are doubts about his contribution to Mondo Bongo as well. The album he made absolutely zero contribution to was In The Long Grass. Cott is as important as any of the others. After all, he got them their first gig.
There are enough alternative Rats to have a tribute band. Now what do we call them?
Boomtown Cats The Joeys Rats in trap???
The Barton Rats would do nicely (or The Bradbury Rats). There are a few cases of competing original bands after the group fragments. I believe the Barton/Beale/Crowe/Roberts incarnation weren't allowed to use "The" when promoting the band. Boomtown Rats was OK, but not The Boomtown Rats.
There are a few bands who don't have a The yet are known as The whatever band. Happy Mondays are one example. They even confused themselves calling their album The Best of The Happy Mondays! I'd rather all bands dropped the The, except for of course The The, who would then be known as The. The really screws up your MP3 ordering.
I have a recorded interview of Geldof. It lasts about 45 minutes and is largely about the use of 'the'. He 'had' to have a name which used 'the'. Perhaps he has an obsession with it .
For me the only one missing in this line up Is Fingers As Cott had well jumped ship.
By the time Cott had jumped ship it was mostly over. I'm not sure if he made any contribution to V Deep, but he may have being involved on some of the songs were initially written for Mondo Bongo. I suppose reading between the lines of Visconti's biography there are doubts about his contribution to Mondo Bongo as well. The album he made absolutely zero contribution to was In The Long Grass. Cott is as important as any of the others. After all, he got them their first gig.
That's my point. Cott did not like the root Geldof and co were taking. So he left
The Beatles made the big time with Ringo. Not any other drummer. That's the differents. For me any way
They got their recording contract with EMI before Ringo came on board. Pete Best was thrown out by Brian Epstein after his ineptness on the original recording. Love Me Do was recorded twice. A session drummer provided the drums on the single version of Love Me Do though due to a pressing error some of the early singles had Ringo's effort. Apparently Ringo hates the A side, but thinks the B side is pretty good
There are enough alternative Rats to have a tribute band. Now what do we call them?
Boomtown Cats The Joeys Rats in trap???
The Barton Rats would do nicely (or The Bradbury Rats). There are a few cases of competing original bands after the group fragments. I believe the Barton/Beale/Crowe/Roberts incarnation weren't allowed to use "The" when promoting the band. Boomtown Rats was OK, but not The Boomtown Rats.
There are a few bands who don't have a The yet are known as The whatever band. Happy Mondays are one example. They even confused themselves calling their album The Best of The Happy Mondays! I'd rather all bands dropped the The, except for of course The The, who would then be known as The. The really screws up your MP3 ordering.
Glad Geldof insisted on The BR. Sounds better. The Human League mainly prefaced their name with The but would sometimes drop it. Pretty sure their Greatest Hits is simply titled Human League.